<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Diggings - Latest Comments in Job Aggregators Versus Job Search Engines</title><link>http://diggings.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://diggings.disqus.com/job_aggregators_versus_job_search_engines/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:39:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Job Aggregators Versus Job Search Engines</title><link>http://diggingsblog.com/blog/2009/09/28/job-aggregators-versus-job-search-engines/#comment-19673351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Toby:&lt;br&gt;The fact that LinkUp spiders company sites instead of receiving feeds from those sites doesn't change the fact that LinkUp is an aggregator. And there is nothing wrong with that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You aggregate all that data into a database to allow user to search it. The difference is in the lack of duplicates and scam jobs. Which is a very good thing. The search process and linkthrough is identical. Which is also a good thing. Let's not make more of a difference out of it than it actually is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc Drees</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:39:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>